Home
Mac Package - StatPlus:mac
Buy StatPlus
Buy StatPlus:mac
StatPlus 2007 Professional Help Prev Page Prev Page
StatPlus
License agreement
Support
What's New
Getting started
Loading program
Using Keyboard
Entering Data
Editing Data
Statistics
Analyzing Data
Bibliography
Elementary Concepts
Basic Statistics
Descriptive Statistics
Comparing Means
One Sample T-Test
F-Test Two-Sample for Variances
Linear Correlation (Pearson)
Fechner Correlation
Covariance
Normality Tests
Frequency Tables
Cross Tabulation
ANOVA
One-way ANOVA
Two-way and Three-way ANOVA
GLM ANOVA
Latin Squares Analysis
Regression
Linear Regression
Polynomial regression
Stepwise Regression
Binary logistic regression
Cox proportional-hazards regression
Nonparametric statistics
2x2 Tables
Rank Correlations
Comparing two independent samples
Comparing multiple independent samples
Comparing two dependent samples
Comparing multiple dependent samples
Cochran Q Test
Time Series/Forecasting
Autocorrelation and Partial AC
Moving Average
Interrupted Series Analysis
Survival Analysis
Cox proportional-hazards regression
Probit analysis
Charts
Control Charts
Tutorial On Chart Building
Function Reference
All Functions
Math
General
Statistical
Financial
Customizing StatPlus
General
View
Saving
Add-ons
Other
About AnalystSoft

Purpose

    This procedure can compute three different alternatives to the parametric Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient: Spearman rank R, Kendall Tau, and Gamma.

Preparations

    Run Statistics→Nonparametric Statistics →Rank Correlations.... command.

Results

Spearman rank R. Spearman rank R can be thought of as the regular Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (Pearson r); that is, in terms of the proportion of variability accounted for, except that Spearman R is computed from ranks. Spearman R assumes that the variables under consideration were measured on at least an ordinal (rank order) scale; that is, the individual observations (cases) can be ranked into two ordered series. Detailed discussions of the Spearman R statistic and its power and efficiency can be found in Gibbons (1985), Hays (1981), McNemar (1969), Siegel and Castellan (1988), Kendall (1948), Olds (1949), or Hotelling and Pabst (1936).

Kendall Tau. Kendall Tau is equivalent to Spearman R with regard to the underlying assumptions. It is also comparable in terms of its statistical power. However, Spearman R and Kendall Tau are usually not identical in magnitude because their underlying logic as well as their computational formulas are very different. Siegel and Castellan (1988) express the relationship of the two measures in terms of the inequality:

-1 £ 3 * Kendall tau - 2 * Spearman R £ 1

    More importantly, Kendall Tau and Spearman R imply different interpretations: Spearman R can be thought of as the regular Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; that is, in terms of proportion of variability accounted for, except that Spearman R is computed from ranks. Kendall Tau, on the other hand, represents a probability; that is, it is the difference between the probability that the two variables are in the same order in the observed data versus the probability that the two variables are in different orders.

Gamma. The Gamma statistic is preferable to Spearman R or Kendall Tau when the data contain many tied observations. In terms of the underlying assumptions, Gamma is equivalent to Spearman R or Kendall Tau; in terms of its interpretation and computation, it is more similar to Kendall Tau than Spearman R. In short, Gamma is also a probability; specifically, it is computed as the difference between the probability that the rank ordering of the two variables agree minus the probability that they disagree, divided by 1 minus the probability of ties. Thus, Gamma is basically equivalent to Kendall Tau, except that ties are explicitly taken into account.